Halo Talk
This is a sample guest message. Register a free account today to become a member! Once signed in, you'll be able to participate on this site by adding your own topics and posts, as well as connect with other members through your own private inbox!
Should i get COD4 or Halo 3 or Bioshock ?
- Thread starter amr R
- Start date
get halo 3, trust me, iv also played all of those games, and halo 3 is the one u can have the most fun out of, especially if you have friends, or when you get live, the fun is non stop
you can custom make your own games and invite people to your game (map) plus u can get rank depending on how many people you kill and how wins etc...
but in the long run, halo 3 is just one of the perfect games for the 360 because of it's features, and great multilayer action
you can custom make your own games and invite people to your game (map) plus u can get rank depending on how many people you kill and how wins etc...
but in the long run, halo 3 is just one of the perfect games for the 360 because of it's features, and great multilayer action
xxxkidrough
New member
Halo 3 FOR SURE!!
Bioshock looks GREAT but at the end it sucks!
Bioshock looks GREAT but at the end it sucks!
wrathful_gnome
New member
If you liked Halo 2 or are looking for something thats different from Halo 2 don't got for Halo 3 it is basically the same but they have so much problems that make no sense.
The mauler(new weapon) is a 1handed shot gun and can easily beat and other close range or melee weapon.
The beat down system(which they are looking into to chang but iunno yet) is like this: Person A and person B start shooting eachother at the same time with the same gun, person A goes for the beat down first, while person B with slower reflexes keeps shooting then soon after he sees person A beat down he beats down too, person B gets the kill and takes no damage from person A's beat down.
Why? Because person B shot more bullets resulting in more damage than person A did before the beat downs. Although person B had slower reflexes and hit after person A did he gets the kill because he did more damage before hand.
To make it simple if you get in a fight like that and he beats down first while you keep shooting and you beat down before he goes back to his normal stance you would get the kill because you technically did more damage, but his beat down would not count and you would live.
I would say COD4 the exp is usful in that game, not just bragging rights.
Bioshock is a great game but once you've beaten it you don't want to play it again.
The mauler(new weapon) is a 1handed shot gun and can easily beat and other close range or melee weapon.
The beat down system(which they are looking into to chang but iunno yet) is like this: Person A and person B start shooting eachother at the same time with the same gun, person A goes for the beat down first, while person B with slower reflexes keeps shooting then soon after he sees person A beat down he beats down too, person B gets the kill and takes no damage from person A's beat down.
Why? Because person B shot more bullets resulting in more damage than person A did before the beat downs. Although person B had slower reflexes and hit after person A did he gets the kill because he did more damage before hand.
To make it simple if you get in a fight like that and he beats down first while you keep shooting and you beat down before he goes back to his normal stance you would get the kill because you technically did more damage, but his beat down would not count and you would live.
I would say COD4 the exp is usful in that game, not just bragging rights.
Bioshock is a great game but once you've beaten it you don't want to play it again.